The second day of IDF 2016 San Francisco has come to a close. I started off the day by taking in a keynote presented in equal parts by Murthy Renduchintala and Diane Bryant. Sandwiched between customer meetings I indulged in a handful of Technical Sessions. I also spent some time walking around the Technology Showcase checking out the wares from our sponsors and partners.
Dr. Renduchintala's portion of the keynote focused largely on the continuing explosion of data surrounding us and how this is creating an inflection point on the path to 5G. Guests on stage included Jonathan Shipman of Twitch* and gamer commentator/vlogger Sonja Reid. Moderating a panel discussion on 5G was IoT authority Stacy Higginbotham. The panel itself was comprised of (in addition to Dr. Renduchintala): Tom Keathley of AT&T*, Seizo Onoe of NTT docomo*, and John Gordon of GE*. Predictions ranged from LTE having another 10 years of life to pre-standards 5G deployments happening by 2018 and standards-based 5G deployments by 2020.
Up next was Diane Bryant’s keynote. Diane spoke about a future of thousands of clouds delivering millions of services to billions of devices. That’s a lot of zeroes. Aligned to that vision was an announcement of Intel® Rack Scale Design (version 1.0), engineered to support the disaggregation of compute, network and storage resources in the data center. Designed to help manage the resources in these data centers of the future, the open telemetry framework Snap was also highlighted. Diane then went on to introduce Intel® Silicon Photonics with the help of Kushagra Vaid from Microsoft* describing how these devices can provide 100 Gbps connectivity between rows in the data center, with a path to 400 Gbps to individual racks in the near future.
In a bit of a comical exchange with Diane Bryant, John Donovan of AT&T was brought on stage after AT&T was described as the “+1” in the “Super 7 + 1”, and poked a little fun about being labeled the “+1”. Getting back on script, AT&T’s focus on virtualizing networks was called out as exemplifying leadership in their industry.
The theme of the keynote then switched to machine learning, and Slater Victoroff of indico(*) talked about how well Intel® Xeon Phi™ and Intel Xeon® processors are suited to text and image analysis workloads. Following Slater Victoroff was Jing Wang of Baidu discussing the benefits of Intel architecture for Artificial Intelligence workloads. This all set the stage for a teaser on the upcoming Knights Mill- the next generation Intel® Xeon Phi™ processor.
After the morning keynote I took in the following Technical Sessions:
- Apache Spark*in Enterprise Analytics- Where I learned how much Intel contributes to this project and how through both hardware and software we are reducing the time to information.
- The Complete Toolset for Accelerating Analytics – From Optimized System Architecture to Accelerators- Here I learned deployment guidelines for optimizing for outright performance vs. total cost of ownership (TCO) vs. performance per Watt.
- Wicked Fast Storage and Beyond- A packed room listened to Intel Fellow Frank Hady talk about how 3D XPoint™ will make storage as fast the rest of the computing platform. This is cool stuff- rather than me try to summarize the talk, it’s well worth your time to follow the link above and read the session materials.
See below for some pictures taken throughout the course of today. I will be sticking around for most of day 3 on the 18th, but work life balance calls and it’s time to see how my daughter likes (I hope) her new elementary school firsthand. Accordingly, tomorrow’s blog edition may end up being a bit briefer compared to my earlier ones, but at least it will be a faster read for you all… 🙂
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Source: Internal Testing
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
Tests document performance of components on a particular test, in specific systems. Differences in hardware, software, or configuration will affect actual performance. Consult other sources of information to evaluate performance as you consider your purchase. For more complete information about performance and benchmark results, visit http://www.intel.com/performance.
Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.
Copyright © 2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.